HOTSPOTS

911 CONSPIRACY Ethyl Mercury Toxicity Jenny McCarthy Vaccines and Autism Rep Posey

DR BERGMAN DR SENEFF DR HUMPHRIES Dr Bark DR GROUP DR BROWNSTEIN CRITICAL HEALTH NEWS Critical Health News Chiropractor Dr Nick Wilson Gabby Pack n YTC ALEX JONES GEORGE NOORY Gerald Clemente Gabby Pack n CHINA'S DRUG CHIEF EXECUTED Dr Hilleman MERCK VACCINE PIONEER Crisis Actors CIA Casey Mass Killings VACCINES DONT WORK Clean Fusion END NASA NVIC VACCINE IMPACT VOTE DONT MATTER 1st amendment 2nd Amendment 4th Amendment

Showing posts with label MOON HOAX. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MOON HOAX. Show all posts

Thursday, December 17, 2015

NASA CIRCUS MAXIMUS


NASA CIRCUS MAXIMUS

Einzug der Gladiatoren

HAYNES BAKED BEANS COMMERCIAL

NASA HOAX
    NEWS    VIDEOS    IMAGES    SHOPPING    BOOKS    PDF    SCHOLAR


VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS
    NEWS    VIDEOS    BOOKS    PDF     SHOPPING
  SCHOLAR     

Risks of Space Travel

  - There is a long list of things that can get you in space,
        -  it is not an empty vacuum

    NEWS    VIDEOS    SHOPPING    BOOKS    PDF    PPT   EBOOK SCHOLAR


Two NASA Clowns Suspended from Wires in the ISS 
     -  Clown admits we can only fly in Earth Orbit
   
     -  Orion is Apollo 2.0 - Burning more of ur tax money


It looks like the ISS space station may have at least some scam parts to it, if not everything.

 - Fake weightlessness via special plane rides
 - Fake floating via wire and harness

Still researching

WHY EVERYONE(80%) THINKS WE WENT TO THE MOON

IT'S EASIER TO FOOL PEOPLE THAN TO CONVINCE
THEM THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOOLED
- Mark Twain
REASONS PEOPLE THINK THAT WE REALLY WENT TO THE MOON:

1. NASA SAYS SO
2. THE IMPLICATIONS
3. ADMIT BEING FOOLED
4. DON'T WANT TO GO AGAINST THE CROWD
5. SCARED OF WHAT IT MEANS ABOUT AMERICA
6. SCARED OF WHAT IT MEANS ABOUT SPACE
7. SCARED OF WHAT THE THOUGHT DOES TO THEIR HEROES
8. SCARED








Wednesday, December 16, 2015

NASA CIRCUS MAXIMUS

NASA CIRCUS MAXIMUS

Einzug der Gladiatoren

HAYNES BAKED BEANS COMMERCIAL

WHY EVERYONE(80%) THINKS WE WENT TO THE MOON

IT'S EASIER TO FOOL PEOPLE THAN TO CONVINCE
THEM THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOOLED
- Mark Twain
REASONS PEOPLE THINK THAT WE REALLY WENT TO THE MOON:

1. NASA SAYS SO
2. THE IMPLICATIONS
3. ADMIT BEING FOOLED
4. DON'T WANT TO GO AGAINST THE CROWD
5. SCARED OF WHAT IT MEANS ABOUT AMERICA
6. SCARED OF WHAT IT MEANS ABOUT SPACE
7. SCARED OF WHAT THE THOUGHT DOES TO THEIR HEROES
8. SCARED









Sunday, December 13, 2015

APOLLO MOON LANDING IMPOSSIBLE

VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS
VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS STILL PREVENT US FROM SENDING HUMANS BEYOND EARTH ORBIT.

APOLLO MISSION NEVER COULD HAVE SENT A MAN TO THE MOON.

INTERESTING NOTE:

Van Allen Belts were discovered in early 1958.

NASA was started later that year.


Risks of Space Travel

  - There is a long list of things that can get you in space,
        -  it is not an empty vacuum

    NEWS    VIDEOS    SHOPPING    BOOKS    PDF    PPT   EBOOK SCHOLAR




NASA APOLLO TETR-A SATELLITE


NASA had a satellite named TETR-A that could send test data simulating a real Apollo spacecraft's information.

Also as Huston receives it's data from satellite dishes around the world, that data could be anything coming from anywhere, including inside mission control itself.

Would this have been doable in 1969? Absolutely, as a former computer guy working for AT&T Network Systems, I myself am qualified to answer this question.

Someone in the control room could not be absolutely sure where that data was coming from.

The guy sitting at the console would not even think of questioning it.

Also, maybe the guy at the console was an insider.

Or, maybe the guy at the console was told to keep hush if they saw anything out of the ordinary, and immediately report such to a certain person.

MOON FAKER - TETR-A VIDEO

TETR-A WRITEUP





Monday, December 7, 2015

DO THE MATH

THIS L.E.M. OBVIOUSLY HAS AN OPEN BACKSIDE


PAPER MOON VIDEO

The numbers are in.
ALREADY OUT OF THE HOLE

No way could the Astronauts move around in the LEM with space suits on.

No way.

Do the math.

That rover could not have fit in the bottom part either.
---
It looks like they could not have fit in there to begin with much less move around.

The exit is way to the top right.

How would they get up there with all that space suit stuff on?
---
I have yet to see an image of one of the lunar Astronauts coming THROUGH THE HOLE.

They are always positioned just outside of the hole.

I just don't see one coming through the exit hole with the hasselblad camera attached!!!

Much less moving around inside the LEM!!!!

Talk about Two Bulls in a Sardine Can China Shop!!!!









NO FLY ZONE

LOOKS GOOD...JUST WON'T FLY

PAPER MOON VIDEO

YEP.

It looks like the LEM (Lunar Excursion Module) was never tested anywhere.

The gizmo used by Astronauts for training was a special gizmo that simulated landing in a 1 /6th gravity situation.

At least one of them blew up with Neil Armstrong on it, He safely ejected.

Some suggest that there would not have been enough room inside the module for two Astronauts.

About 2 feet by 3 feet.
---
Also, there have been concerns about the stability of such a device with just one engine.

If there is a sudden shift in the weight distribution, the lander could go out of control.

I just cannot see something like this being put out there with NO TESTING.
---
Also, the later missions allegedly carried the Lunar Rover.

I just do not see any room for that device in the module drawings I have seen.

Maybe like they say about the command module parachutes. We compressed them down to where they are hard as wood...
---
P.S. so far I as I know, the Lunar Rovers were $30 MILLION A PIECE!

p.s.s. Before I started my research, I thought we had  went. Now I don't


Sunday, December 6, 2015

LEM FEET ARE JUST TOO CLEAN


These feet are way too clean!
No dirt on LEM feet.


SHOW ME THE THRUST

TOP OF LANDER JERKED UP BY CABLE

MAN NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON VIDEO

ANIMATION OF HOW IT SHOULD HAVE LOOKED

Where is the engine thrust

Like the guy says in the video, it is not just one thing.

It is a never ending list of things that do not add up.

-------------
Stuff that should be in the shadows is lit up.

Only explanation is multiple light sources.

Surface reflective light not an option.

Lunar surface on reflects 7% of its light.

EASY BAKE OVEN

EASY BAKE OVEN - DOUBLE BAKED FILM
NASA APOLLO PHOTO PAGE

I see references to the Camera being modified for the extreme temps on the Moon, but I have yet to find a reference to special film needed to survive the same.

In recent readings concerning the Moon landing, Mars landing and Moon revisiting, there seems to be a great concern about Lunar dust.  In one reading it talks about not being able to get back into the LEM with the dusty spacesuits.  Concerns over the extreme amount of dust and the LEM electronics.
---
Over and over again it seems they explain how they went to extremes to engineer things for the Moon , but at the same time remain completely oblivious to other things that would have needed extreme engineering as well.
===============================
Remember the 1970 Easy Bake Oven?

Two 100 watt light bulbs could bake a cake.
---
I have not got the alleged details on the film yet....but...

Imagine the film being in an easy bake oven, only powered by the unfiltered Sun that never goes down.

Plus, all the other radiation that the known and unknown universe is spewing out at you.

Imagine how hot it must get in that little oven.
---
Now, Imagine that little oven when it is inside of a bigger oven (the LEM)

I can only imagine how hot the inside of the camera is sitting inside the LEM on the hot side of the Moon.

I am trying to imagine what kind of specs one would need for the film?

Could it be made of the same stuff regular film is made of?

Even so, would the emulsions hold up?





MOON ROCKS OR CAMERAS?



ONLY 1 OF 14 CAMERAS BROUGHT BACK FROM MOON


Ummmm Ummmm Ummmm.

I gotta tell you guys.

The more I dig, the more paper mache moon rocks I uncover.

Now I read where there were a total of 14 Hasselblad E70 Moon Certified cameras taken to the Moon.

Guess how many were brought back....one...

Don't know about the film.

Bringing back EXTRA moon rocks was more important than the camera!

Sounds like a BOGUS excuse to me.

Don't know what is real and what is not.


Saturday, December 5, 2015

LUNAR HASSELBLAD 500 EL/M


APOLLO LUNAR HASSELBLAD CAMERA

Analysis of the Lunar Photography

BILLY'S MOON HOAX YT PLAYLIST

There was a Hasselblad created just for the moon.

160 Degrees C. Motorized drive w big trigger.

So the camera is covered.
---
Hasselblad company person says the sun was the only lunar light source.
---

Don't know about the film though.

But of course, the more issues I resolve, the more I uncover.

It looks like the media concerning Apollo 11 is bogus though.

Shadows and lights sources look like either done on a set, or doctored after the fact.

None the less, not real.
---
You got to remember though, it looks like that camera NEVER MADE IT TO THE MOON!




MOON LANDING HOAX - BBC DOCUMENTARY

NO DOUBT MOST MEDIA WAS BOGUS


MOON LANDING HOAX - BBC DOCUMENTARY
===
Alex Jones (talk show host) claims that he had an acquaintance that says they had active telemetry and other data coming from the Apollo spacecraft.

Well, as it turns out,  NASA sent up a Tetra satellite just before the Apollo missions which could accurately send back information and telemetry identical as if an Apollo craft were near the Moon
---
How convenient was that!!!
===

Sorry.

I have read / heard various comments about the nature of the Van Allen Radiation Belts and what would be needed to protect someone from them.

Wikipedia says that Apollo astronauts were protected enough considering the short time they were exposed to them.

Van Allen belts were only discovered in 1958.

Did they think they knew enough about them to just throw something out there willy-nilly?

They are still learning about them now after sending two probes dedicated to their study just recently.
----
The BBC documentary "Moon landing hoax" says:

1/8" Aluminum shielding is not good enough to stop Van Allen Radiation Belt stuff.

Not to mention all the other radiation coming from the whole universe.
---
Cannot carry enough lead to stop it.
---
What about the space suits?
---
Yeah. What about the space suits.
---
Wouldn't matter how much lead you put in the suits.

Why?
---
How much lead was in the visor?
----
It seems that the Van Allen belts will be a big challenge for the new craft going to the Moon or Mars.

Well, if it is a big challenge now, how did we slam dunk it in 1969?
---
It seems to me the logical choice would have been to just fake it.

Now, how did they get the Russians to go along with the hoax?



Thursday, December 3, 2015

ASTRONAUT ON STRINGS

HE IS FALLING UP, NOT DOWN
STRINGS PULL ASTRONAUT UP

BILLYS MOON HOAX PLAYLIST

MOON HOAX LIST OF PLAYLISTS

GO CAPRICORN ONE

GO MOON HOAX
    NEWS    IMAGES    VIDEOS    BOOKS    SCHOLAR    PDF    SHOPPING

-----
YEP.

They used wires to pull the astronaut up.

Of course, I assume I am looking at what was given us as real moon footage.

Another one of those pesky details.

Gee, I wonder if they could have gotten up if they had fallen down on the real moon.
---
As in the movie Capricorn One, I don't see why you would risk even sending the astronauts into Earth orbit. What if some stupid problem happened there and you had no astronauts to show coming home?

And as you will see in one of those Moon Hoax videos, the capsule looks like it had been in the ocean a good long time.



Wednesday, December 2, 2015

MOON HOAX

HASSELBLAD CAMERA
Unprotected Hasselblad Camera.

Film would have melted.

Just one of many.

Like 9/11 sort of.

Just too many impossibilities.
-----------------------------------------
The more I research, the more it looks like all the media we were shown was faked.
-----------------------------------------
NASA is now talking about technologies not yet developed that would be necessary to "GO BACK" to the moon.
------------------------------------------

  1. DEALING WITH THE DUST
  2. DEALING WITH THE RADIATION
  3. NOT ABLE TO GET THERE IN ONE ROCKET
---------------------------------------------

In addition to the critically outspoken Gus Grissom, the critically outspoken safety manager Thomas Baron was killed in an accident.

Gus Grissom in a test capsule fire.

Thomas Baron, wife and step-daughter killed in a crash with a train. 

Thomas had just testified before congress that the Apollo program was in bad shape.

His 500 page report disappeared.
---
Gus Grissom said that "Someone is going to get killed."

Boy was he right on that one.




Monday, November 23, 2015

DISNEY'S MOON HOAX

DISNEY WAS ALREADY THERE
DISNEY'S MAN IN SPACE

THIS DAY IN DISNEY HISTORY WEBPAGE
DISNEY & VON BRAUN APRIL 1965



Fact: Mr. Disney was involved with NASA.
---

The BIGGEST problem I have with the APOLLO PROGRAM.

APOLLO 13.

Sounds a lot like 911, doesn't it.

You know....unlucky 13, call 911 for emergency...

A super-arrogant government rubbing it in our faces.
---

You don't know how hard I have tried to avoid this.
----

It is looking like the Apollo, Moon, and associate space photos were done here on earth.

Studio, Lab, etc. by not so photo professionals.

People that have had some photo experience can identity flaws that make the photo as advertised impossible.
---
Both astronauts in the photo where their shadows do not make sense.

Arrays of spot lights in the background.

No dust on the lander feet.

No crater crated by LEM landing.

Astronaut in LEM without space suit talking while engine engaged; engine would have been way to loud for that to be real.

Bouncing around effect done by 1/2 speed slow motion.

If you speed up the footage it looks like they are back on earth.

Temperature in LEM on hot side of moon would have been about 240 degrees F, too hot to be in without space suit on.

DISNEY DID SPACE BEFORE NASA
Neil Armstrong allegedly manually piloted the LEM down. If he had his space suit on he could not have operated the controls with the limited mobility offered by the space suit gloves, if he had the suit off he could not have been communicating because the engines noise would have been too loud, also it would have been way to hot on the sunny side of the moon (240 F).

I think that Neil Armstrong may have been selected to be the "first man on the moon," because of his psychological profile. The man most likely to keep his mouth shut over the long haul. He went on to teach at the University of Cincinnati, where he later died. Not talking much about his experience on the moon.
---
Then there is the command module.

There was way too much stuff, that NASA claims was there, to fit into the tiny capsule.

Including the parachutes.

Also, in landing, the capsule shown in the ocean has a sea weathered look to it, it does not look like a shiny new space capsule.

Some people claim that the impact would have been way to hard for the astronauts to survive.

At certain heights and speeds, the water surface may as well be concrete.
---
If NASA ever does admit to any of this, they will just say, well in any case, we still went to the moon.....

---
Remember, MARS is NOT RED, NASA colored the photos to make it appear that MARS was red.

That is an undisputed fact.